FRCA Notes


Cricoid Pressure in RSI



Rationale

  • Pulmonary aspiration at induction is rare but carries high morbidity and mortality
  • Aspiration was the single commonest cause of airway-related death in NAP4, and several deaths followed omission of RSI in high-risk patients
  • Cricoid pressure (CP) aims to prevent passive regurgitation between loss of consciousness and cuff inflation, as popularised by Sellick (1961)
  • The case for CP rests on a plausible mechanism, functional occlusion studies and the scale of harm when aspiration happens (although none of it is based on evidence from a trial)

Mechanism

  • Original concept: the oesophagus is compressed between the cricoid ring and the C6 vertebral body
  • MRI work (Rice 2009) shows CP compresses the post-cricoid hypopharynx, which moves with the cricoid as one unit:
    • Lateral position of the oesophagus may therefore not matter
    • The target has shifted from oesophagus to hypopharynx meaning studies refuting oesophageal occlusion do not necessarily refute hypopharyngeal occlusion
  • Cadaver work: 20 N held back 25 mmHg and 30 N held back 40 mmHg of oesophageal pressure; gastric pressure under anaesthesia is usually below 25 mmHg

Year Study What it showed
1961 Sellick 26 high-risk patients; no regurgitation with CP, regurgitation in 3 on release. Uncontrolled
1992 Vanner and Pryle (cadavers) 20-30 N holds back oesophageal pressures above typical gastric pressures
1997 Vanner et al. At 30 N, laryngeal view unchanged or improved; harm came from excessive force
2009 Rice et al. (MRI) CP compresses the post-cricoid hypopharynx whatever the position of the oesophagus
2011 NAP4 Aspiration caused over half of airway deaths; omitting RSI caused harm; no major complication attributed to CP
2014 Zeidan et al. 30 N stopped a nasogastric tube passing in anaesthetised patients: functional occlusion
2021 Hung et al. (meta-analysis) CP did not reduce first-attempt or overall intubation success with videolaryngoscopy

Key arguments

  • Mechanical occlusion is real when force is right: 30 N prevents passage of a nasogastric tube in anaesthetised, paralysed patients
  • Limits gastric insufflation during mask ventilation; relevant now that gentle mask ventilation during RSI is accepted practice
  • Correct technique reduces the harms:
    • At 30 N the laryngoscopic view is usually unchanged or improved
    • Videolaryngoscopy lets the team see and correct poor placement
    • With videolaryngoscopy, CP does not reduce first-attempt success, although tube advancement may be harder
  • Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence:
    • A trial powered for clinically important aspiration would need tens of thousands of high-risk patients
    • IRIS could not exclude more than a doubling of aspiration risk without CP (upper 95% confidence limit for relative risk 2.38)
  • Medicolegal weight: UK courts (M v East Hertfordshire HA, 1991) and US closed claims data have treated omission as the riskier position for the clinician

No proven outcome benefit and potential for harm


Year Study What it showed
1993 Brimacombe et al. CP reduced LMA insertion success from 94% to 67%
1997 Tournadre et al. CP lowers lower oesophageal sphincter tone in awake volunteers
2000 Palmer and Ball; Hartsilver and Vanner Cord closure common at 30-40 N i.e. CP can obstruct the airway
2003 Smith et al. (CT, MRI) Oesophagus lateral to the cricoid in about 50% of adults and CP displaces it further
2006 Levitan et al. CP worsened the laryngeal view compared with BURP or bimanual laryngoscopy
2015 Cochrane review No RCT met inclusion criteria
2016 Andruszkiewicz et al. (ultrasound) Paralaryngeal pressure, not CP, compressed the oesophagus
2019 IRIS RCT Similar aspiration with sham; worse views and slower intubation with CP
2020 White et al. (meta-analysis) No protection against aspiration and intubation may be harder

Impairs airway management

  • Laryngoscopy: in IRIS, Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4 views doubled (10% vs 5%) and intubation took about 4 s longer
  • Ventilation: at 30-40 N CP can close the vocal cords and reduce tidal volumes during mask ventilation
  • Rescue devices: reduces first-time LMA insertion and impairs ProSeal placement; second-generation SADs are less affected, the i-gel least

May provoke the problem it targets

  • Reduces lower oesophageal sphincter tone
  • More than 20 N in the awake patient is uncomfortable and can provoke retching
  • Vomiting against CP risks oesophageal rupture
  • In 9 of 11 obstetric aspiration deaths in a Malawi series, cricoid pressure had been applied
  • CP was used in about half of US closed claims for aspiration

Inconsistent anatomy and technique

  • The oesophagus lies lateral to the cricoid in about half of adults, and CP displaces it further
  • Only about 23% of staff apply the target force before training and the skill decays within weeks
  • The laryngoscope itself pushes against the applied force, so 30 N is hard to maintain during laryngoscopy

Evolution of guidance


Year Source What it said or found
1970 Stept and Safar 'Rapid induction/intubation' codified, with CP as a core element
1999 Vanner and Asai 10 N awake rising to 30 N; how and when to release. Became the UK technique
2010 AHA resuscitation guidelines Routine CP in cardiac arrest no longer recommended
2015 DAS and OAA/DAS guidelines CP retained; release under vision with suction ready, reapply if regurgitation
2016 UK vs European survey CP used in trauma RSI by 83% in the UK vs 39% elsewhere in Europe
2020 PUMA universal principles CP listed as an optional component of RSI
2023 NAP7 Correctly applied CP judged low-risk and removable
2025 DAS 2025 guidelines Use when aspiration risk is particularly high, at the right site by a trained assistant; remove for a poor view, SAD insertion or active vomiting
2026 RCoA/AoA/DAS RSI statement Case for CP more compelling as risk rises; keep on for regurgitation after loss of consciousness

Current UK position

  • RCoA/AoA/DAS (2026): CP is a risk-graded choice the clinician must be able to justify, not an automatic part of every RSI
  • When: aspiration risk is a spectrum; the higher the risk (e.g. bowel obstruction, high gastric volume on ultrasound), the stronger the case for CP
  • Who: only an assistant trained in the technique who practises it; use ultrasound to locate the cricoid if there is doubt

Technique

  1. Identify the cricoid before induction
  2. Apply about 10 N (1 kg) while the patient is awake; more is poorly tolerated and can cause retching
  3. Increase to 30 N (3 kg) at loss of consciousness
  4. Use a videolaryngoscope, which lets the team see the effect of CP on the view
  5. Maintain until cuff inflation and capnography confirm tracheal placement
  • Paratracheal pressure (applied to the left of the trachea at C6-7) has been shown to provide a non-inferior laryngeal view, less gastric insufflation and easier i-gel insertion than CP

Indications for release

  • Difficult laryngoscopy or mask ventilation: reduce, then remove, under vision with suction in hand
  • Insertion of a supraglottic airway
  • Active vomiting or retching before loss of consciousness: risk of oesophageal rupture

Contraindications

  • Active vomiting
  • Laryngeal or tracheal trauma
  • Unstable cervical spine injury (relative)
  • Upper oesophageal foreign body or pharyngeal pouch

International practice

  • The UK is unusual in keeping CP as a conditional, risk-graded part of RSI; much of the rest of the world treats it as optional

Hover over (or tap) a region or its key to see the national guideline position.

Guideline positions summarised from the resources above..