Advantages | Disadvantages |
↓ blood loss (& thus transfusion req'ment) | Cost (initial + ongoing) |
↓ Post-operative pain (& thus opioid req'ment) | Extra training |
↓ LOS | Time delay to undock in case of complication |
↓ Need for tracheostomy | Loss of surgical tactile feedback |
Improved cosmetic outcome & QoL | Bulky equipment needs extra storage space |
Faster recovery of safe swallowing and normal speech | Any patient movement can have disastrous consequences |
Shorter duration of surgery | Potential ethical issues training surgeons on unwitting patients |
↓Post-operative wound infections | |
↓VTE | |
Less NG/PEG feeding required | |
↓ Requirements for neoadjuvant chemo-/radio-therapy |
Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery
Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery
This topic is included in light of a fairly recent BJA education article on the topic (see below) and because the inclusion of a CRQ on robotic (general) surgery in September 2022 has opened Pandora's robotic box.
Resources
- Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is used for treating both benign and neoplastic conditions of the head and neck in a minimally invasive fashion, most commonly:
- Lateral oropharyngectomy
- Tongue base hemiglossectomy
- Supraglottic laryngectomy
- Tongue base mucosectomy
- It benefits from reducing the need for trans-facial or trans-mandibular surgical approaches and their associated morbidity
- Furthermore it facilitates greater surgical precision, more delicate tissue handling, greater access and greater instrument flexibility
- Conversely, it adds complexity to an already complex, sharing-the-airway surgical cohort
- TORS is being used for a variable and growing list of head and neck surgeries
- There are some contraindications, however, such as:
- Trismus or other limitations to mouth opening
- Limited (or total lack of) neck extension e.g. due to spinal pathology, previous radiotherapy
- Macroglossia
- Lesions infiltrating bone e.g. mandible or maxilla
- Lesions involving the carotid artery
- Large lymph nodes not suitable for TORS (even if primary cancer is)
- Lack of suitable equipment and staff
Perioperative management of the patient undergoing TORS
- Pre-operative assessment follows a similar pattern for the patient with the same pathology undergoing non-robotic surgery e.g. those with head and neck cancer
Airway assessment and planning
- Meticulous airway assessment as a difficult airway is likely in view of:
- Supra-, sub- or glottic lesion(s)
- Previous airway surgery
- Head/neck chemo-/radio-therapy
- It should take the form of a clinical assessment and review of imaging including FNE, panendoscopy and cross-sectional imaging
- Existing dentition should be carefully documented owing to the risk of dental damage
- Airway plans should be clearly communicated in advance between anaesthetic and surgical teams
- Difficult intubation increases the risk of conversion from TORS to an open procedure as a result of poor surgical access
Monitoring
- AAGBI as standard
- Cannulae in the arm contralateral to the robot
- ± A-line
- ± CVC (femoral)
- Depth of anaesthesia monitoring, certainly if TIVA technique
- Long breathing circuit
- ± NG tube for enteral feeding post-operatively
Induction
- Induction in theatre may be preferable to limit transfers and issues associated with them
- Surgeons should be present during induction/extubation with tracheostomy equipment available in case of complications
- Airway choice should be discussed with surgeon, e.g.:
- Armoured tube
- Nasal North-facing RAE
- LASER tube
- Ensure the tube is inserted deep enough so as not to be dislodged when the head is extended during surgical positioning and when the surgical instruments are being placed
- Ensure cuff properly inflated (20 - 30cmH2O) to reduce aspiration of debris/blood from surgery
Maintenance
- TIVA or volatile + remi is suitable; TIVA benefits from uncoupling the airway from the mode of anaesthesia
- Remifentanil comes with the standard benefits associated with head and neck surgery
- Clonidine, IV lidocaine and magnesium can be used to further blunt the hypertensive responses to airway manipulation e.g. gag or instrument insertion
- Full, qToF-guided (tibial nerve) neuromuscular blockade throughout is recommended to optimise surgical conditions and minimise risk of disastrous patient movement
- Aim FiO2 <0.3 if LASER surgery
Positioning
- Meticulous eye protection and padding inc. goggles
- Ensure pressure points protected and arms properly wrapped
- Ensure properly positioned as once robot is docked there should be no movement of, and limited access to, patient
Homeostatic bundle
- Temperature control/warming
- Mechanical VTE prophylaxis
- Multi-modal anti-emetic prophylaxis including dexamethasone
- Judicious use of fluids to avoid airway oedema
Extubation
- Careful extubation
- Avoid Guedel airways as bite blocks as may damage tissue and cause bleeding
- Follow (enhanced recovery) post-operative plan
Analgesia
- Often less sore than open surgical counterparts
- Multi-modal analgesia with:
- Regular simple analgesics
- PRN short-acting opioid e.g. fentanyl in PCA or patch form
- Consider opioid-sparing agents inc. gabapentinoids
- Post-operative dexamethasone has anti-emetic and analgesic properties whilst improving swallowing and reducing length of stay
- Enteral analgesia should be liquid owing to high risk of dysphagia; SALT input invariably required
Post-operative bleeding
- Significant bleeding occurs in up to 9.8%
- Most common on day 10 post-operatively
- Mostly self-limiting, minor, venous bleeding
- Can be catastrophic due to arterial erosion or vasodilation
- More likely if higher-grade tumour, recurrent disease or larger resection
- Mortality via aspiration and asphyxiation
- Minor bleeding e.g. blood in saliva occurs in up to 27%
Airway and respiratory
- Airway oedema e.g. larynx, uvular, face
- Tongue oedema (14%)
- Airway obstruction of any cause (9%)
- Airway infection (2-3%)
- Aspiration ± LRTI (up to 15%)
- Need for tracheostomy (up to 5% in complex cases)
- Sore throat (common, severe in up to 10%)
- Altered phonation (4%)
Neurological
- Pain
- Hypoglossal nerve injury (1%)
- Lingual nerve injury (1-3%)
- Ocular injury
Gastrointestinal
- Pharyngo-cutaneous fistula formation
- Dehydration
- Dysphagia and long-term (>6 months) PEG dependency
- Dysgeusia
- Nasopharyngeal reflux
- Velopharyngeal insufficiently
MSK
- Skin lacerations
- Dental damage (1-2%)
- Mucosal lacerations
- Bony injury inc. mandible, C-spine
- Neck pain (severe in 1%)